The idea that there is historical, philosophical, and moral progress was already present in antiquity and became widespread at the latest in the age of Enlightenment. At the same time the critique of the idea of a purposive and linear development from what is bad or deficient to something better in accordance with a definite logic or grand plan has never fallen silent. The catastrophes of the 20th century have not been the only events that cast doubt on whether progress and regression can be so easily separated. This doubt has also raised the suspicion that the idea of progress itself has served as an ideological category that must be rejected in the name of openness and plurality. But what would be the cost of such a rejection?
A detailed exposition of the topic and all relevant information concerning the character and history of the colloquium as well as matters of accommodation and costs can be found on our website:
http://userpage.fu-berlin.de/~gbertram/topic.html